She's Thunderstorms









me: are there any spirits listening
ouija: yes are you alone
me: yes
ouija: haha nice whats up :P
me: trying to contact my dead grandmother
ouija: cool cool so what would u be doing if i was alive right now lol

109,098 notesReblog 2 days ago
judahbooty:

Every kid should be this appreciative

judahbooty:

Every kid should be this appreciative

(Source: acidocasualidad)


205,801 notesReblog 2 days ago
impossiblycastiel:

Steal Her Look: Dancing Emoji
Marchesa silk gazar gown ($6,950)
Casadei pumps ($1,300)

impossiblycastiel:

Steal Her Look: Dancing Emoji


Marchesa silk gazar gown ($6,950)

Casadei pumps ($1,300)


62,695 notesReblog 2 days ago

brucetimms:

Jason Todd, Under The Red Hood

image


1,312 notesReblog 2 days ago

(Source: halfbunny)


447,994 notesReblog 2 days ago

killemjaneym:

sixpenceee:

The Incan stonework is famous for it’s large stones (some over 100 tons) that fit so precisely together that “not even a knife could be inserted between the joints.”

How the Incans were able to transport these massive building blocks and handled is something we don’t quite understand today. What we do know is that the cutting marks on some of the stone blocks are very similar to those found on the pyramidion of the unfinished obelisk in Egypt. 

SOURCE


8,173 notesReblog 4 days ago

sixpenceee:

toi-lanp:

sixpenceee:

Oh my god.

So I found this on reddit and apparently this women uploaded a crying picture of her baby, and facebook asked if she’s like to tag the other face.

She was home alone that day. 

IM STRAIGHT UP IN GHE MOTHE FUCKING DARK RIGHT NOW. ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME

For those who can’t see it: 


10,008 notesReblog 4 days ago

gumbal1:

stovestalker:

noshamejustlove:

zorobro:

shota-purinsu:

zorobro:

linzthenerd:

theguilteaparty:

crippledcuriosity:

itsfondue:

Isn’t it nice how people twist their religious scripture to suit their weds but when it’s used against them it’s suddenly not okay

I talked to a monk about this quote once (we have mutual friends, and he came to a New Year’s Eve party at my shared art studio). He said this isn’t even talking about homosexuality. That the bible never actually says homosexuality is wrong. What that passage means is this:

Women were treated as subservient and it that you shouldn’t treat other men as subservient, like they are beneath you. It is not talking about homosexuality. If it was, it would say it outright since the bible lists other things outright.

I take the word of a monk who have studied the bible extensively more than a self proclaimed Christian.

The above text, I would like to point out is from the point of view of this translation of the original Hebrew. I spoke with my cousin’s rabbi on the matter and his response was different, saying that it was a mistranslation. See, the true translation says that a man shall not lie with another in the bed of a woman, which is to say, the Hebrews had a shit ton of rules about when a man was or was not allowed in a woman’s bed and private quarters (including, if she didn’t want you there, you weren’t allowed there. Hebrew women were also allowed to divorce their husbands and the image of the ‘oppressive Hebrew people’ is an image that was propogated by Christianity which, historically speaking, doesn’t treat the Jewish people too well and liked to paint them as being rather barbaric and backwards and cultish with their traditions, which, another piece of fun info, their traditions were one of the main reasons why the Jewish people were less likely, in medieval times, to die of the plague. Because washing your hands and avoiding the dead and vermin and the like was a lot of help. Of course the Christians persecuted them for not dying but that’s another matter. I’m sidetracked). So the verse is literally saying ‘Don’t fuck in some lady’s bed because that’s just goddamn rude’

Also, whenever a Christian brings the book of Leviticus up, you should feel free to point out that these are rules that were given to make the Hebrew people prepared for when the son of God came to earth. In Christianity, it’s believed the son of God was Jesus. So by following the rules set in Leviticus or pushing them as things we should follow, they’re saying that Jesus was not the son of God, and that Jesus did not, in fact, die for our sins. Jewish people believe, in their faith, that the son of God hasn’t yet been born, so many choose to follow these rules.

Most people of course roll their eyes when I explain the translation of the verse (full breakdown found here) but it’s always fun to point out the nature of the rules in Leviticus and the implications of following them. 

I’m a theology student and I am on the verge of crying because of how accurate this commentary is. Historical context is simultaneously the most interesting and most important part of interpreting any texts. 

Most religious people seem to base their beliefs on things that are severely mistranslated. I wish they would do their research before using the bible for hate.

I studied theology extensively and was going to become a theologist until I switched majors. The above commentary is 100% accurate and what I try to stress in a lot if conversations with Bible Thumpers.

Jesus also affirms the homosexual relationship between the Roman Centurion and his “slave”. The particular Greek word used to refer to this special slave was “pais”. Greek language studies and contexts show that a “pais” was a male love slave. Regular slaves were called “dolos”. The Centurion makes this distinction clearly when he asks Jesus to heal his slave (pais), and then to prove his status he tells Jesus that his slaves (dolos) go when he tells them to. But this slave (pais) was special. He was the Centurion’s lover.

Hearing this, Jesus was so amazed he says he had not found ANYONE ELSE who had such great faith. He then blesses the Centurion and heals his male lover.

Matthew 8:5-13

THIS IS WHAT THE BIBLE REALLY TEACHES ABOUT SAME SEX COUPLES.

In short, the English adaptation is a mistranslated farce.

^^^^this

reblogging for the comments ^^^^^^

EXCUSE ME WHILE I REBLOG THIS FIFTY MILLION TIMES

INCOMING JEWISH HISTORY NERD MOMENT

To add on, the use of “Hell” in the bible is a convenient mistranslation. Commonly, in it’s place would have been “Sheol” and “Gehenna”. “Sheol” referred to a place, either actual or symbolic for the grave, where all, righteous or not, would end up. “Gehenna” is, iirc, used to refer to a constantly burning trash heap. Generally, again iirc, the bodies of criminals would be burned. In addition, “Tartarus” appears as a verb in the Greek version of the New Testament. It is supposed to refer to the casting down of rebellious angels.

Funny thing about the concept of an everlasting torment: It doesn’t really appear all that much in the Bible.

Granted, I guess the early Catholic Church found it more fun to persuade people with visions of everlasting torment.

(Source: idiotsonfb)


504,866 notesReblog 5 days ago
thatisnotahat:

I’ve been watching this for 5 minutes and giggling like an idiot.

thatisnotahat:

I’ve been watching this for 5 minutes and giggling like an idiot.


356,640 notesReblog 5 days ago
dustjacketattic:

tina leung by stockholm streetstyle

dustjacketattic:

tina leung by stockholm streetstyle


41 notesReblog 5 days ago
1 2 3 4 5 »
Queen Theme ®
Theme by: Heloísa Teixeira